Not only does Dalglish have to get his players to quickly try to adapt to some new tactics, but he also has the unenviable job of having to safeguard his players from unwanted media and other external pressure. And for the players, not only do they now not have a key playmaker to take responsibility, they also have to try to improve their game whilst learning new tactical roles and movements.
Plus, a team without Suarez is a lot less intimidating than a team with the striker, meaning a win against Liverpool or a point at Anfield is a lot easier to achieve. Like the early part of the season where everyone was beating Arsenal , the same could happen to Liverpool; with the main sting in their side taken out, teams will have a lot more belief when facing the Reds.
January was most likely the month in which Liverpool were aiming for their highest amount of points, something which will be a lot harder to achieve now that Suarez is out. By the end of the Gunners clash, Liverpool's dreams of Champions League, maybe along with Europa League ambitions, could well be down the drain, all courtesy of Luis Suarez.
Enjoy our content? He is a role model to millions of kids around the world so he should be punished harshly. Well done the FA. Comment posted by U, at 24 Apr U He BIT another player for the 2nd time!!!!!!! It should be more. Suarez may be world class but he is a total disgrace as a human. As a Liverpool fan, I think 10 game ban is great for him! He had previous for diving, cheating, even previous for Biting. If you think 10 game ban is too much then you are deluded.
He should have also got kicked out of a country and Liverpool should sell him this summer. I am a LFC fan. Comment posted by Alex, at 24 Apr Alex.
My 9 year old nephew is a big Liverpool fan. During the Evra saga he defended him claiming Evra "asked for it. I can see first hand how Suarez has already begun to damage football and future generations. Comment posted by Gonchong, at 24 Apr Gonchong.
Surely they are joking! Correct decision. Not to be mistakenly compared with the racism charge, as this was his 2nd offence of this type, biting,which in itself is fairly unique. His abhorrent behaviour all round means that a lengthier ban was appropriate, purely on a topping-up basis for all offences. Can't stand the bloke.
He is everything that is wrong with modern football and has IMO got off lightly. Would happily pay for a 1 one way ticket for him back to Uruaguay. Liverpool should not shame themselves anymore by trying to defend him or protest his punishments. Good, serves him right. In his career he has bitten two players, racially abused another, and dives in just about every match.
There are probably more disgusting things he has done, but taking into account his history, 10 matches is perfect! Good riddance and hope to never see him in the PL again. Comment posted by Taffy, at 24 Apr Taffy. Liverpool should sack him. Why are they even considering keeping him in the 'sport'.
It is time football grew up, get rid of him, he has no place in any sport worthy of the name. He'll now have 3 entries in the list of longest bans. What a disgrace! Recommended Suarez's Liverpool career in jeopardy Comment: Move past the shock value and get some perspective Has Suarez harmed Liverpool's reputation one too many times?
Chiellini was bit by Suarez during the second half of Italy's defeat. Already subscribed? Log in. Forgotten your password? Want an ad-free experience? View offers.
0コメント